Mirza Basic vs Andrej Nedic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Oct at 09:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Basic vs A. Nedic

BIH
0
Win
Played
2
Win

BIH
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Basic 0 - 2 Nedic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Mirza Basic winning 1 and Andrej Nedic winning 4. The last match between Andrej Nedic and Mirza Basic was at the M15 Bol, 24-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Andrej Nedic getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Basic | 0 |
| Nedic | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Bol(10-24-25)
(R2) M25 Zlatibor(09-26-24)
M. Basic vs A. Nedic H2H Profile
M. Basic vs A. Nedic Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Mirza Basic has secured 44.16% of points on his second serve in the past six months, slightly ahead of Andrej Nedic's 42.46%. Does this present a notable edge for Mirza Basic? Yes, it offers a slight advantage in potential service games.
- Return Game Statistics: Andrej Nedic shows stronger recent form, winning 46.28% of opponents' second serve points compared to Mirza Basic’s 41.03%. On first serve returns, Nedic also leads at 30.96% versus Basic’s 28.31%.
- Pressure Situations: Mirza Basic has saved 47.47% of breakpoints recently, narrowly outperforming Nedic's 47.19%. Could this indicate better composure under pressure?
- Overall Performance: In the last year, Mirza Basic has a 67.86% match win rate, with Nedic slightly ahead at 71.23%. Does this hint at Nedic having better form?
- Favorite Surface: Mirza Basic performs best on indoor hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Nedic excels on clay with a 58% win rate.
- Player Level: Basic has clinched 73.91% of his encounters in lower-level tournaments, compared to Nedic's 75.76% in similar events. Does the minute difference favor Nedic in competitive play?
- Direct Head to Head: Nedic leads their direct encounters, winning their sole match 2-1 in sets on clay.
- Opponent Strength: Nedic's opponents have a slightly better average ranking (388.52) compared to Basic’s (421.55) in the past year.
- Deciding Set Performance: If this clash goes to a deciding set, Nedic has a 69% win rate, superior to Basic's 56% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 24, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing both players' stats, several key differences emerge that favor Andrej Nedic. His superior performance in return games and deciding sets are decisive factors.
Mirza Basic's slightly better second-serve statistics are overshadowed by Nedic's overall return game strength. Additionally, Nedic's previous head-to-head win and slightly higher opponent ranking quality further tip the scale in his favor.
While both players have comparable all-surface win rates, Nedic's decisive set record suggests he is more resilient in tight matches. Given these insights, Andrej Nedic is the likely victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Mirza Basic vs Andrej Nedic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Basic vs A. Nedic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 19 | Games Won | 25 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:44:2 | Average Match Time | 1:44:2 |
| 59% (82/139) | 1st Serve % | 72% (108/150) |
| 71% (58/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (73/108) |
| 42% (24/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (7/14) |
| 39% (59/150) | Return Points Win % | 41% (57/139) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Basic Recent Matches Played
A. Nedic Recent Matches Played

M. Basic vs A. Nedic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.13% (525/394) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.00% (136/67) |
| 55.27% (1170/947) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.52% (289/166) |
| 51.62% (10621/9954) | Games Win/Loss | 55.76% (2310/1833) |
| 57.14% (132/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.18% (203/152) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.53% (131/63) |
| 58.86% (176/123) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 41.18% (14/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 3219 | Aces Total | 219 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1223 | Total Double Faults | 352 |
| 1:7:15 | Average Match Time | 1:23:29 |
| 580.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.6 |
| 61% (28902/47444) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6876/10802) |
| 71% (20589/28902) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4366/6876) |
| 52% (9678/18540) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1973/3926) |
| 41% (1742/4252) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (684/1363) |
| 37% (17802/47677) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5023/10941) |
| 34.15% (14/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 51.89% (55/51) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.70% (249/198) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 67.25% (191/93) | Futures W/L | 70.90% (134/55) |
| 57% (503/878) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (133/199) |
| 58% (14/24) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (185/321) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (14/31) |
| 57% (150/264) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (32/51) |
| 87% (494/432) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (136/122) |
| 12% (494/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (136/14) |
| 22% (424/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (67/14) |